the ADVANCE 1 trial apixaban did notmeet the criteria for noninferiority compared with enoxaparinfor prevention GDC-0068 of VTE in patients undergoing TKR.45The principal efficacy outcome occurred in 9% of patientsin the apixaban group and in 8.8% within the enoxaparin group.Main or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in2.9% of patients within the apixaban group and in 4.3% in theenoxaparin group. Main bleeding occurred in0.7% of patients within the apixaban group and in 1.4% in theenoxaparin group.In the ADVANCE 2 trial apixaban was compared withenoxaparin in patients undergoing TKR.46 The incidence ofthe principal efficacy outcome was 15.1% within the apixabangroup and 24.4% within the enoxaparin group. Proximal DVT, symptomatic nonfatalPE, and VTE-related death occurred in 1.1% of patients givenapixaban and in 2.
2% of patients offered enoxaparin. Clinically relevant bleedingoccurred in 3.5%and 4.8% with the patients offered apixaban and enoxaparin,respectively. A Phase III randomized, GDC-0068 double-blindstudy has been recently completed aimed at assessing therelative efficacy and safety of apixaban and enoxaparin for35 days in patients undergoing elective THR surgery.New anti-Xa in Phase II trialsThe oral anti-Xa betrixaban has been compared withenoxaparin, both started postoperatively in patients undergoingTKR.47 DVT on mandatory unilateral venography orsymptomatic proximal, or PE was reported via to day14 in 20%, 15%, and 10% of patients receiving increasingdoses of betrixaban or enoxaparin, respectively. No bleedingcomplications had been reported within the betrixaban 15 mggroup. Main bleeding occurred in 2.
3% of patients in theenoxaparin group.Two Phase II studies have explored the efficacy and safetyof edoxaban for the prevention of VTE in significant orthopedicsurgery. Edoxaban Lapatinib reduced the incidence of VTE inside a dosedependentfashion in comparison with placebo, with no asignificant boost in bleeding complications in patientsundergoing TKR.48 Edoxaban was compared with dalteparinin patients undergoing THR.49 VTE occurred in 43.3% ofpatients within the dalteparin group and in 28.2%, 21.2%, 15.2%,and 10.6% of patients receiving edoxaban, respectively. Nobleeding was reported within the dalteparin group. The incidenceof significant or clinically significant nonmajor bleeding in theedoxaban groups ranged from 1.6% with reduce doses to 2.3%for greater doses.
The efficacy and safety of YM150 for the preventionof VTE in patients NSCLC undergoing THR was investigated in aPhase II study.27 Individuals had been randomized to once-dailyYM150 starting 6–10 hours soon after hip replacement or toreceive subcutaneous enoxaparin for 7–10 days. A significantdose-related trend within the incidence of VTEwas observed with YM150. Threeclinically relevant nonmajor bleedings had been observed, one inthe 3 mg and two within the 10 mg YM150 dose groups. ThePhase II ONYX-2 study confirmed a significant decreasein the incidence of DVT, symptomatic VTE, PE, and deathwith escalating doses of YM150 in patients undergoingTHR surgery.50 Numerous Phase II and Phase III studieshave been designed testing this agent, of which some arecompleted and some are at present ongoing.
The aim of thesestudies is usually to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a variety of dosesof YM150 for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoingmajor orthopedic surgery in comparison with enoxaparin orwarfarin.The oral anti-Xa razaxaban has been compared with twicedaily 30 mg enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective kneesurgery.29 Razaxaban was efficient at any evaluated Lapatinib dosage,but highest doses had been related to a lot more bleedingsthan enoxaparin. No further study has been performed withrazaxaban.In patients undergoing THR or TKR, prophylaxis withLY517717 resulted inside a dose-dependent reduce in theincidence of VTE. The incidences of overall, symptomatic,or asymptomatic VTE was 19%, 19%, and 16% withincreasing doses of LY517717, respectively, comparedwith 21% for enoxaparin.
All the doses of LY517717 metthe predefined criteria GDC-0068 for noninferiority compared withenoxaparin for the prevention of VTE soon after TKR or THR,with equivalent rates of bleeding complications.28 No studiesare at present ongoing with this agent in patients undergoingorthopedic Lapatinib surgery.Inside a dose-finding study, the efficacy of unique dosesof eribaxaban has been compared with that of enoxaparinin patients undergoing TKR.30 VTE occurred in 37%, 37%,29%, 19%, 14%, 1.4%, and 11% of patients receivingincreasing doses of eribaxaban, respectively, compared with18% of patients receiving enoxaparin. This study showed anonsignificant dose-related boost within the incidence of totalbleeding, mainly accounted for by minor bleeding.A dose-finding study is at present underway to assess theefficacy and safety of TAK-442 in comparison with enoxaparinfor the prevention of VTE soon after TKR. A Phase II study has also beendesigned to assess the efficacy and safety of GW813893 inthe prophylaxis of VTE following TKR..Inside a Phase II study, 690 patients undergoing TKRsurgery had been randomized to AVE5026 or enoxaparin.32A
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
New Perspective On Lapatinib GDC-0068 Just Published
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment